23 May 2013
I think it’s rather stupid when people tell me to stop something just because I will die earlier of it. For example smoking, people always say don’t smoke because you will die like 5 years earlier then normal people. But that so stupid and wrong because the death isn’t a fixed point. You can’t say someone who smokes or drinks alcohol dies earlier then someone who drives like crazy or someone who gets hit by a bus. This theory just doesn’t work. So people should calm about the death and live every day of their life.
Actuallllllly no-one thinks you should quit smoking because you’re going to die younger. If anything, people are arguably kept alive much longer than they should be these days with all the medical technology we have.
You should quit smoking because:
- You will get erectile dysfunction if you’re a male. (The link between smoking and erectile dysfunction is strongest in younger men, and the more they smoke the more likely their equipment will let them down. SOURCE)
- You will have bad skin and gross teeth.
- You smell bad all of the time.
- You’re wasting your money on smokes when you could be spending them on clothes and shoes and handbags.
- You’re more likely to get blood clots if you’re a girl and on the pill.
- You will mostly likely have a heart attack (or multiple heart attacks) in your 40s and then need to be on 20 tablets for the rest of your life and possibly require bypass surgery with nice big scars down your arms and chest.
- You won’t be able to keep up with your mates in sports etc.
I don’t understand why anyone would start, these days. I never have. There are so many better ways to waste your health and money.
I tried to kiss a smoker for a week and it was just the worst.
23 May 2013
For months, every morning when my daughter was in preschool, I watched her construct an elaborate castle out of blocks, colorful plastic discs, bits of rope, ribbons and feathers, only to have the same little boy gleefully destroy it within seconds of its completion.
No matter how many times he did it, his parents never swooped in BEFORE the morning’s live 3-D reenactment of “Invasion of AstroMonster.” This is what they’d say repeatedly:
“You know! Boys will be boys!”
“He’s just going through a phase!”
“He’s such a boy! He LOVES destroying things!”
“Oh my god! Girls and boys are SO different!”
“He. Just. Can’t. Help himself!”
I tried to teach my daughter how to stop this from happening. She asked him politely not to do it. We talked about some things she might do. She moved where she built. She stood in his way. She built a stronger foundation to the castle, so that, if he did get to it, she wouldn’t have to rebuild the whole thing. In the meantime, I imagine his parents thinking, “What red-blooded boy wouldn’t knock it down?”
She built a beautiful, glittery castle in a public space.
It was so tempting.
He just couldn’t control himself and, being a boy, had violent inclinations.
She had to keep her building safe.
Her consent didn’t matter. Besides, it’s not like she made a big fuss when he knocked it down. It wasn’t a “legitimate” knocking over if she didn’t throw a tantrum.
His desire — for power, destruction, control, whatever- - was understandable.
Maybe she “shouldn’t have gone to preschool” at all. OR, better if she just kept her building activities to home.
I know it’s a lurid metaphor, but I taught my daughter the preschool block precursor of don’t “get raped” and this child, Boy #1, did not learn the preschool equivalent of “don’t rape.”
Not once did his parents talk to him about invading another person’s space and claiming for his own purposes something that was not his to claim. Respect for her and her work and words was not something he was learning. How much of the boy’s behavior in coming years would be excused in these ways, be calibrated to meet these expectations and enforce the “rules” his parents kept repeating?
There was another boy who, similarly, decided to knock down her castle one day. When he did it his mother took him in hand, explained to him that it was not his to destroy, asked him how he thought my daughter felt after working so hard on her building and walked over with him so he could apologize. That probably wasn’t much fun for him, but he did not do it again.
There was a third child. He was really smart. He asked if he could knock her building down. She, beneficent ruler of all pre-circle-time castle construction, said yes… but only after she was done building it and said it was OK. They worked out a plan together and eventually he started building things with her and they would both knock the thing down with unadulterated joy. You can’t make this stuff up.
Take each of these three boys and consider what he might do when he’s older, say, at college, drunk at a party, mad at an ex-girlfriend who rebuffs him and uses words that she expects will be meaningful and respected, “No, I don’t want to. Stop. Leave.”
The “overarching attitudinal characteristic” of abusive men is entitlement.
(Source: lastlifeinuniverse, via idiot-legs)
Tags: #newstart #dole #centrelink #auspol #australia #australian politics #salvos #salvation army #poverty #job seekers #the age #news #julia gillard #alp
23 May 2013
Most of us thought that when the filter legislation was dropped, the issue was over. However, on the day it was dropped, Senator Conroy announced that the government could achieve almost the same outcomes offered by the mandatory filter through existing legislation.
This creeping evolution of internet censorship has slipped under the radar of many Australians, who might be surprised to know the extent of the government’s powers.
23 May 2013
Three Hydro-Electric Commission workers stand in front of the Lea Tree - estimated between 2,000 & 4,000 years old - that they chainsawed and drilled-and-filled as a reprisal against Franklin Dam protesters, South-West Tasmania, 1983.
I wrote about the Lea Tree on this blog before, but I can’t find the original entry. To bring you up to speed though, the vandalism of the Lea Tree - an ancient Huon Pine (Dacrydium Franklinii) - is detailed in this chapter from the Australian Institute of Criminology. The key paragraphs, though, are as follows:
[After the High Court handed down its decision that the construction of the Franklin Dam would not proceed] officials were still concerned that the rainforest area at Warner’s Landing might be vandalised in protest against the High Court decision.
These concerns proved to be well founded. Near Warner’s Landing stood a Huon Pine tree some 9 feet in diameter. It was a sufficiently prominent landmark to have acquired a name - the Lea Tree. Three men, all over six feet tall, found that they were unable to link arms around the trunk. The tree was so old that it had been left by the convict cutters of the 1820s as of no use for boat building. Given its size, it was quite likely more than 2,000 years old.
On the night of 5 July, 1983, the tree was chainsawed, holes were drilled in it, oil was poured in the holes, and the tree was set alight. The fire continued for at least twenty-four hours.
Whilst it has been suggested by some that the tree was burned by conservationists to attract publicity, a more plausible explanation is that the tree was vandalised by pro-dam interests as an act of reprisal.
Allegations that HEC personnel were responsible for the incident are supported by photographs of HEC workers holding placards bearing various anti-conservationist messages in front of the charred tree. One photograph shows three workers posed next to the smouldering trunk, on which the words ‘[Expletive] You Green [Expletive]’ were painted.
When I initially read that chapter, I could not find that photo anywhere online. Today I stopped by Readings however and found that it had been published in Alex Hungerford’s “UpRiver - Untold Stories of the Franklin River Activists”.
Seeing the picture really brings a whole new level of uneasiness to the story itself. Reading the tale without the image allows it to somehow remain something of an abstraction. There was a tree; some men; the assumed smell of diesel and noise; but all faceless though.
With the image, though, there are no longer abstractions. The embers of the tree glow in the background. What you assumed the expletives to be are laid out bare. They look like my father’s friends, they have the faces of people I know. The lit cigarette. The stubby of beer. Hell, I own helmets with earmuffs like that. There’s that line in that song by Okkervil River, ya know:
Now, with all these cameras focused on my face
You’d think they could see it through my skin
They’re looking for evil, thinking they can trace it, but
Evil don’t look like anything.30 years ago in a little over a month.
Aperture: f/2.4
Exposure: 1/20th
Focal Length: 4mm
22 May 2013
Kim is amazing because I can ask her to play basically any song on the piano that she’s heard before and she just does it.
I can even have her listen briefly to a song she’s not familiar with and she bangs out a pretty good rendition.
She’s currently distracted from her Beethoven by playing ‘Daylight’ by Matt and Kim and ‘Sharp Shooter’ by Hungry Kids of Hungary for me.
22 May 2013
Forget the rom-com clichés — falling in love can be totally terrifying for someone with depression.
(Source: kimtheshizz)
Tags: #Is that allowed Canberra ya weirdo? #anon #anonymous #ask #asks
22 May 2013
For my ~individual street shot~ they had me standing at a tram stop, in front of the courts.
I could not be more comfortable with this.
Tags: #I am NERVOUS D: #me #fashun
21 May 2013
I just keep thinking about when I was in China and Japan and Chinese tourists would ask to take photos with me and then pull faces when they saw the result.
21 May 2013
I just received a horrifying email saying that our faces might be used on posters, flyers and even - possibly - a BILLBOARD but it’s going to be ok because look, look at this one perfect curl I managed to make with a blowdryer and a round barrel brush for the first time ever. ♥
21 May 2013
I was very angry at Telstra on the tram today.
I got strange looks but I feel like I could have avoided them had I turned around and said “Telstra” with a sigh.
(Source: buysexual, via roger-explosion)
21 May 2013
SO THIS GUY IN MY ENGLISH IS DOING A PROJECT FOR BIO WHERE HE GETS A DUCKLING TO IMPRINT ON HIM SO HE JUST CARRIES IT AROUND WITH HIM TO ALL OF HIS CLASSES AND I SWEAR THIS DUCK IS THE MOST WELL BEHAVED FUCKING POULTRY IVE EVER SEEN IT JUST SITS ON HIS DESK QUIETLY AND SOMETIMES HE PUTS IT IN HIS POCKET AND IT JUST SLEEPS LIKE WOW YOU GO DUCKY
I have always wanted to do this.
(via roger-explosion)


